IOLS in an office setting		Personal Lighting System		Office of the Future demonstration at CLTC with IOLS

To gather feedback and validate onsite performance of a task lighting

• Commercial offices
• Residential offices

• Energy savings: 50% annual energy savings; over 15 years, one system can yield savings of 7,500 kWh
• Cost-effective replacement for many office applications

• Cost effective for many retrofit, remodeling, and new construction applications
• Best retrofit paybacks result when T12's are replaced with T8, total lamp quantity is reduced, and users employ task lighting frequently
• Able to achieve lighting power density below the new Title 24 2008 requirements
• Improved lighting quality, easy to install, creates a personal workspace in open office areas

The University of California/California State University (UC/CSU) and Investor-Owned Utility (IOU) Partnership Program has identified incentives for this technology that range from $60 to $80 per fixture.

The task fixtures are currently available from Finelite, Inc. and include multiple options such as wattage and mounting type. There are multiple fixture types in the series.

Pre-retrofit Post-retrofit		DEMONSTRATION LOCATION: Bateson Building Sacramento, CA Performance results/energy savings: 44% savings compared to standard T8 office systems ~2,700 kWh savings per year Date of Install: Winter 2007 Timeframe of testing/evaluation: Spring / Summer 2007 Partners: Bateson Building, Finelite, Inc. Sponsors: California Energy Commission
Pre-retrofit Post-retrofit		DEMONSTRATION LOCATION: Butte College Facilities Building Performance results/energy savings: 68% savings compared to standard T8 office systems ~2,500 kWh savings per year Date of Install: Summer 2007 Timeframe of testing/evaluation: Fall / Winter 2007 Partners: California Community Colleges, Finelite, Inc. Sponsors: California Energy Commission
Pre-retrofit Post-retrofit		DEMONSTRATION LOCATION: Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo Facility Services Performance results/energy savings: 35% - 64% savings compared to older T8 troffers and task lighting ~3,000 kWh savings per year Date of Install: Summer 2008 Timeframe of testing/evaluation: Summer 2008 Partners: Finelite, Inc., California State University Sponsors: California Energy Commission
Post-retrofit		DEMONSTRATION LOCATION: Department of Motor Vehicles Sacramento, CA Performance results/energy savings: 25% savings compared to standard T8 office systems ~1,500 kWh savings per year Date of Install: Winter 2007 Timeframe of testing/evaluation: Spring / Summer 2007 Partners: Department of Motor Vehicles, Finelite, Inc. Sponsors: California Energy Commission
Pre-retrofit		DEMONSTRATION LOCATION: Gexpro Hayward, CA Performance results/energy savings: 59% savings compared to standard T8 office systems ~5,000 kWh savings per year Date of Install: Winter 2007 Timeframe of testing/evaluation: Spring / Summer 2007 Partners: Finelite, Inc., Gexpro Sponsors: California Energy Commission
		DEMONSTRATION LOCATION: University of California, Santa Barbara Phelps Hall Performance results/energy savings: 40% Date of Install: Winter 2007 Timeframe of testing/evaluation: Winter 2007 Partners: Finelite, Inc., University of California Sponsors: California Energy Commission

REFERENCE:

• UC / CSU case study: Integrated Office Lighting System (IOLS)
• CCC / IOU case study: Integrated Office Lighting System (IOLS)
• Dynamic project map
• Construction specification: PDF | DOC
• LEED fact sheets
• Department of Motor Vehicles case study
• University Office of the President case study
• California National Guard Joint Force Headquarters case study
• UC Davis, Mrak Hall case study (With Adura WIPAM)